←back to thread

771 points abetusk | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Jyaif ◴[] No.41878393[source]
> in private, RMN admits it won’t release its scans because it wants to protect its gift shops’ sales revenue from competition from the public making their own replicas.

Sounds like a pretty good reason

replies(4): >>41878476 #>>41878523 #>>41878741 #>>41878777 #
DannyBee ◴[] No.41878777[source]
Except it turns out they also make basically no money from this right now - it's not a meaningful portion of their funding or other monetary support.

This is actually true of most large art museums. SF MoMa makes only 7% of revenue (not actual dollars in funding) from their gift shop and that number only goes in one direction over the years.

Smaller art museums often depend more but that is also changing.

So It's just another nonsense argument

replies(1): >>41879339 #
1. bombcar ◴[] No.41879339[source]
It's also an argument, that even if you granted all there premises - could be quantifiable.

If the gift shop makes $x per year in toto, and some percentage is (or could be) 3D scans, you now have a maximum dollar amount that they can possibly be worth (by calculating the cost of a perpetual annuity). Can't be more - and so even in the worst case you've changed it from a "we will never" to a "we want $x before we do" question.