←back to thread

Reflections on Palantir

(nabeelqu.substack.com)
479 points freditup | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
beedeebeedee ◴[] No.41869866[source]
I'm amazed there's no discussion in the article about Palantir's role in Gaza and their development of Lavender and "Where's Daddy". That goes beyond the gray areas that the author mentions.
replies(2): >>41870222 #>>41894515 #
talldayo[dead post] ◴[] No.41870222[source]
[flagged]
ocular-rockular ◴[] No.41870296[source]
Given that it's a site run by a startup incubator with opaque moderation and a strong American bias, I would imagine that most things that make "line go up" are ok.
replies(1): >>41870664 #
ryandrake ◴[] No.41870664[source]
I don't even think it's always about "line go up". I've talked to real life engineers who evidently have no ethical bar whatsoever--if the technology is cool and complex and an interesting technical problem, they'll work on it, regardless of the real-world application. "Whether my code is used ethically is someone else's problem. I just love technical challenges!" You absolutely see this mentality on HN as well.
replies(3): >>41870933 #>>41871244 #>>41871384 #
dingnuts[dead post] ◴[] No.41871384[source]
[flagged]
1. ethbr1 ◴[] No.41878840[source]
Ethic judgement becomes simple when you outsource the decision of who is and isn't a terrorist.

Is everyone in Gaza a terrorist, in your opinion?