←back to thread

335 points alphabetting | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
wenbin ◴[] No.41872782[source]
NotebookLM is contributing to fake podcasts across the internet, with over 1,300 and counting:

https://github.com/ListenNotes/ai-generated-fake-podcasts/bl...

Google is taking a different approach this time, moving quickly. While NotebookLM is indeed a remarkable tool for personal productivity and learning, it also opens the door for spammers to mass-produce content that isn't meant for human consumption.

Amidst all the praise for this project, I’d like to offer a different perspective. I hope the NotebookLM team sees this and recognizes the seriousness of the spam issue, which will only grow if left unaddressed. If you know someone on the team, please bring this to their attention - Could you please provide a tool or some plain-English guidelines to help detect audio generated by NotebookLM? Is there a watermark or any other identifiable marker that can be used?

Just recently, a Hacker News post highlighted how nearly all Google image results for "baby peacock" are AI-generated: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41767648

It won't be long before we see a similar trend with low-quality, AI-generated fake podcasts flooding the internet.

replies(18): >>41872802 #>>41872821 #>>41872878 #>>41872954 #>>41873067 #>>41873074 #>>41873152 #>>41873269 #>>41873297 #>>41873476 #>>41874055 #>>41874427 #>>41874680 #>>41875008 #>>41877535 #>>41879360 #>>41879521 #>>41880487 #
ghshephard ◴[] No.41873152[source]
Where do you get the "low-quality" part from - my experience with NotebookLM is that they create much higher quality, more informative, more fact based, and more concise podcasts than 99% of the stuff I listen to. I've mostly switched entirely over to NotebookLM for my podcast listening. They, generally, offer a far higher quality experience from my perspective.

Maybe you have the problem backwards - we accidentally end up listening to non NotebookLM podcasts?

replies(8): >>41873207 #>>41873941 #>>41874170 #>>41874328 #>>41875724 #>>41876186 #>>41877830 #>>41879015 #
magicalhippo ◴[] No.41874170[source]
A coworker fed some EU trade regulation page and its official FAQ to NotebookLM, and I was quite impressed with the results.

It was factually accurate, and presented the topic in a manner that was easy to digest and kept it interesting.

I didn't plan to but ended up listening to the whole thing, and I normally don't enjoy the podcast format.

For someone new to the topic, it'd be a pretty great intro compared to reading the official pages.

replies(1): >>41877801 #
1. Kurtz79 ◴[] No.41877801[source]
Yes. For example I fed it a public tender and associated regulations in Norwegian and it was able to answer questions about the parts I mas interested in correctly and succinctly. I have also fed it research papers that normally I would not have the patience or knowledge to go through on my own.

In terms of actual usefulness, it’s one of the AI tools that most impressed me.

The main issue is, of course, privacy.

I have tried to reproduce something similar using AnythingLLM and the low tier Llama models, but of course the experience is much worse, both in terms of results, response times and UI. If someone knows of a better local setup, I’m all ears.

I would consider a Workspace subscription if I could actually trust Google to make good on the commitment of not reading your stuff, which I’m finding hard to do…