←back to thread

157 points craigkerstiens | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
linuxhansl ◴[] No.41873697[source]
Parquet itself is actually not that interesting. It should be able to read (and even write) Iceberg tables.

Also, how does it compare to pg_duckdb (which adds DuckDB execution to Postgres including reading parquet and Iceberg), or duck_fdw (which wraps a DuckDB database, which can be in memory and only pass-through Iceberg/Parquet tables)?

replies(3): >>41874044 #>>41874177 #>>41876793 #
fulafel ◴[] No.41876793[source]
Having the famously crashy DuckDB share a process and memory with PostgreSQL doesn't seem like the most robust setup.
replies(2): >>41876976 #>>41880138 #
1. skeptrune ◴[] No.41876976[source]
I had the exact same reaction