←back to thread

282 points alphabetting | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.295s | source
Show context
simonw ◴[] No.41872266[source]
This works pretty well. I tried it with this guidance prompt:

    You are both pelicans who work as data
    journalist at a pelican news service.
    Discuss this from the perspective of
    pelican data journalists, being sure
    to inject as many pelican related
    anecdotes as possible
Against this article: https://simonwillison.net/2024/Oct/17/video-scraping/

You can listen to the 7m40s resulting MP4 here: https://simonwillison.net/2024/Oct/17/notebooklm-pelicans/

Example snippets:

    You ever find yourself wading through
    mountains of data trying to pluck out
    the juicy bits? It's like hunting for
    a single shrimp in a whole kelp forest,
    am I right?
And:

    The future of data journalism is
    looking brighter than a school of
    silversides reflecting the morning sun.
    Until next time, keep those wings
    spread, those eyes sharp, and those
    minds open. There's a whole ocean
    of data out there just waiting to be
    explored.
replies(3): >>41874868 #>>41876286 #>>41877074 #
mistermann ◴[] No.41876286[source]
Do you think it's possible to make the conversation adversarial or is that against the guardrails?
replies(2): >>41876526 #>>41877246 #
simonw ◴[] No.41876526[source]
I'd be very surprised if they had that completely airtight, I bet we'll see some examples of people breaking that soon.

Hah, just found this on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/notebooklm/comments/1g64iyi/holy_sh... - many f-bombs.

replies(1): >>41876738 #
1. doganugurlu ◴[] No.41876738[source]
That feels/sounds so natural.

It’s amazing how it doesn’t occur to OpenAI and others that the “safety guardrails” really dilute the output. And it’s a display of conservatism. Bizarre to think that in America AI couldn’t swear.

Until today, where Google allowed the AI to behave as the lord intended.