←back to thread

746 points ralusek | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.223s | source
Show context
porphyra ◴[] No.41870564[source]
I find that Adobe is really pulling away from open source software with all this AI stuff. A few years ago it could be argued that GIMP, Inkscape, and Darktable could do almost everything that Photoshop, Illustrator, and Lightroom could, albeit with a jankier user interface.

But now none of the open source software can compete with AI generative fill, AI denoising, and now AI rotation.

replies(12): >>41870630 #>>41870686 #>>41870696 #>>41870867 #>>41870891 #>>41871059 #>>41871202 #>>41871746 #>>41871757 #>>41873609 #>>41875611 #>>41876875 #
dagmx ◴[] No.41873609[source]
With all due respect there’s never been a time when that could have legitimately been argued unless someone was doing relatively basic things with those apps or was a hobbyist.

There’s always been a significant gap in capabilities once you looked past the surface.

I find this sentiment is common among FOSS advocates who don’t actually professionally use those tools.

I am definitely an advocate for free tools closing that gap, but I both design content professionally and contribute to OSS projects to close that gap. So I feel quite confident in saying that gap has always been large when compared to the Adobe suite.

replies(2): >>41874830 #>>41876225 #
1. almostgotcaught ◴[] No.41876225[source]
> I find this sentiment is common among FOSS advocates who don’t actually professionally use those tools.

It's wishful thinking at best and delusion at worst. I see it constantly on hn on many threads. I suspect hn incents that kind of language because people on hn like being pandered to.