Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    Inkscape 1.4

    (inkscape.org)
    561 points s1291 | 16 comments | | HN request time: 1.387s | source | bottom
    1. Jerry2 ◴[] No.41875999[source]
    I love Inkscape so much. I use it every other week to make presentations, slides or just simple graphics when I need it. I illustrated my thesis with it.

    Another piece of 2D vector software that I use and recommend is Graphite [1]. It too is open source. Graphite has nodes and can be procedural in nature. Have them both in your graphics toolbox.

    [1] https://github.com/GraphiteEditor/Graphite

    replies(7): >>41876331 #>>41877008 #>>41877032 #>>41877065 #>>41877960 #>>41878245 #>>41879213 #
    2. sirsinsalot ◴[] No.41876331[source]
    If you've not, please donate x
    3. smartmic ◴[] No.41877008[source]
    Another gem in my graphics toolbox is edraw [1], an embedded vector drawing tool for Emacs. I use it to make quick sketches in Orgmode files, and it is highly recommended for any Emacs enthusiast.

    [1] https://github.com/misohena/el-easydraw

    replies(1): >>41877727 #
    4. weinzierl ◴[] No.41877032[source]
    Inkscape has been a staple in my toolbox for decades. The only gripe I have is that it could have been a bit more stable at times.
    5. teleforce ◴[] No.41877065[source]
    Is there any open source hybrid vector and bitmap drawing tool?

    I used to use Xara Extreme and it's very fast, intuitive and handy mainly due its hybrid features. It's also used to be open source but not anymore:

    http://www.xaraxtreme.org/

    replies(3): >>41877418 #>>41877745 #>>41878637 #
    6. stuaxo ◴[] No.41877418[source]
    Krita is the big one.
    replies(1): >>41877441 #
    7. JayDustheadz ◴[] No.41877441{3}[source]
    Krita doesn't have good vector controls, sadly.
    8. zelphirkalt ◴[] No.41877727[source]
    That is truly impressive. I have a hunch though, that it is not well suitable for proper diagrams, due to all the things like wrapping text that is too long for a line inside a shape, inside the shape onto more lines. Dynamically wrapping text when a node's size changes. Moving edges when nodes are moved. All those things one takes for granted in an actual diagramming tool.
    9. mkl ◴[] No.41877745[source]
    Xara was never fully open source. They kept the renderer proprietary, so it never really had a chance.
    10. bubblesnort ◴[] No.41877960[source]
    Thank you. This is the first time I've heard of the Graphite editor.

    I think it could benefit from availability in package reposirories and looking at the license, it appears the program itself is free under the Apache license but the artwork is non-free. It cannot be modified and commercial use is prohibited.

    When combined, Graphite as a whole is non-free so I won't be compiling this until the artwork is gone. I'll look into providing some dummy files and see where it goes.

    The other packing problem is that there's already a server monitoring program also named Graphite. But given the above, a change of name and new icons would solve both problems.

    replies(1): >>41879430 #
    11. ◴[] No.41878245[source]
    12. lavela ◴[] No.41878637[source]
    Graphite has raster editing in their roadmap[1], but afaik it's not really there yet.

    [1] https://graphite.rs/features/

    13. erellsworth ◴[] No.41879213[source]
    Graphite looks pretty cool. Thanks for sharing!
    14. bobajeff ◴[] No.41879430[source]
    For those who are confused I believe you're referring to the application logo and branding. So basically the Firefox > Iceweasel case again. While the art you create with it is still yours.
    replies(1): >>41881970 #
    15. bubblesnort ◴[] No.41881970{3}[source]
    Of course anything you make yourself is yours. I'm not sure how the license can confuse anyone into thinking it wouldn't be. It likely wouldn't fly with the law anyway. Unless it was all saas.
    replies(1): >>41888752 #
    16. silverliver ◴[] No.41888752{4}[source]
    You'd be surprised. There are a lot of people out there (and here) who think that unilaterally-declared LLM licenses can dictate what they are allowed to do with the output. Hell, a lot of people think that LLM's can be copyrightable. Copyright law is very clear about the conditions required for copyright protection, and LLMs fail to satisfy at least two. Even failing one is sufficient (see the Smiling monkey case).