←back to thread

Understanding how bureaucracy develops

(dhruvmethi.substack.com)
192 points dhruvmethi | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
1. robwwilliams ◴[] No.41875353[source]
Greatly enjoyed this commentary. The example of IRB approvals for biomedical research is unfortunately on the mark.

How much of a full time researcher’s time is bureaucratic overhead? In my case no more than 10% but it feels like 30%.

replies(1): >>41876104 #
2. dhruvmethi ◴[] No.41876104[source]
Thank you for reading!

Even if it takes up only a small percentage of time, it probably takes up the majority of frustration (that's at least true for me)

replies(1): >>41892427 #
3. fuzzfactor ◴[] No.41892427[source]
You haven't seen anything until you've spent a career working in and around measurement & testing bureaus which go back to the 19th century themselves :\

Which are only involved with much bigger institutions harboring their much larger, dissimilar but more dysfunctional and less-professionally-developed "inadvertent" bureaucracies which are most often layered on under emergency conditions.

Hint, the key word is work around.

Don't even think about it until you've spent however many years it takes to "master" the bureaucracy itself, working from within.

Before you even attempt your first workaround, or you could be shot down in flames without a parachute.

I've said it before but you can't herd cats unless you're a cat already.

replies(1): >>41905191 #
4. EricE ◴[] No.41905191{3}[source]
Success in spite of the organization...