←back to thread

721 points ralusek | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.198s | source
Show context
ryandrake ◴[] No.41870217[source]
I'm making some big assumptions about Adobe's product ideation process, but: This seems like the "right" way to approach developing AI products: Find a user need that can't easily be solved with traditional methods and algorithms, decide that AI is appropriate for that thing, and then build an AI system to solve it.

Rather than what many BigTech companies are currently doing: "Wall Street says we need to 'Use AI Somehow'. Let's invest in AI and Find Things To Do with AI. Later, we'll worry about somehow matching these things with user needs."

replies(15): >>41870304 #>>41870341 #>>41870369 #>>41870422 #>>41870672 #>>41870780 #>>41870851 #>>41870929 #>>41871322 #>>41871724 #>>41871915 #>>41871961 #>>41872523 #>>41872850 #>>41873162 #
dmurray ◴[] No.41871915[source]
I would interpret it that they're getting the same push from Wall Street and the same investor-hype-driven product leadership as every other tech firm, but this time they have the good fortune to specialize in one of the few verticals (image editing) where generative AI currently has superhuman performance.

This is a testable claim: where were Adobe in previous hype cycles? Googles "Adobe Blockchain"...looks like they were all about blockchains in 2018 [0], then NFTs and "more sustainable blockchains" in 2022 [1].

[0] https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2018/09/27/blockchain-and-...

[1] https://www.ledgerinsights.com/adobe-moves-to-sustainable-bl...

replies(2): >>41873177 #>>41875242 #
1. throwaway2037 ◴[] No.41875242[source]
I disagree with your analysis. I think this is a novel use of AI in a commercial art product. Is there any AI feature that Adobe could release that you would not view as "pushed from Wall Street"?