←back to thread

182 points Twirrim | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
JamesStuff ◴[] No.41874737[source]
Not sure about that, seems pretty controversial to me. Are we forgetting about the UNIVACs?
replies(4): >>41874803 #>>41874887 #>>41874920 #>>41875416 #
trebligdivad ◴[] No.41874803[source]
Hopefully we are; it's been a long time, but as I remember indexing in strings on them is a disaster.
replies(1): >>41874905 #
1. Animats ◴[] No.41874905[source]
They still exist. You can still run OS 2200 on a Clearpath Dorado.[1] Although it's actually Intel Xeon processors doing an emulation.

Yes, indexing strings of 6-bit FIELDATA characters was a huge headache. UNIVAC had the unfortunate problem of having to settle on a character code in the early 1960s, before ASCII was standardized. At the time, a military 6-bit character set looked like the next big thing. It was better than IBM's code, which mapped to punch card holes and the letters weren't all in one block.

[1] https://www.unisys.com/siteassets/collateral/info-sheets/inf...