←back to thread

721 points ralusek | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.557s | source
Show context
porphyra ◴[] No.41870564[source]
I find that Adobe is really pulling away from open source software with all this AI stuff. A few years ago it could be argued that GIMP, Inkscape, and Darktable could do almost everything that Photoshop, Illustrator, and Lightroom could, albeit with a jankier user interface.

But now none of the open source software can compete with AI generative fill, AI denoising, and now AI rotation.

replies(11): >>41870630 #>>41870686 #>>41870696 #>>41870867 #>>41870891 #>>41871059 #>>41871202 #>>41871746 #>>41871757 #>>41873609 #>>41875611 #
dagmx ◴[] No.41873609[source]
With all due respect there’s never been a time when that could have legitimately been argued unless someone was doing relatively basic things with those apps or was a hobbyist.

There’s always been a significant gap in capabilities once you looked past the surface.

I find this sentiment is common among FOSS advocates who don’t actually professionally use those tools.

I am definitely an advocate for free tools closing that gap, but I both design content professionally and contribute to OSS projects to close that gap. So I feel quite confident in saying that gap has always been large when compared to the Adobe suite.

replies(2): >>41874830 #>>41876225 #
1. woah ◴[] No.41874830[source]
Even if the open source option is only slightly worse, why would a professional allow that to impact how they earn a living?
replies(2): >>41875076 #>>41875930 #
2. dagmx ◴[] No.41875076[source]
Yeah precisely. The Adobe suite is affordable if you’re actively making money off using it. It’s also why there’s not as much investment in competing open source projects.

$80 CAD/mo for the whole suite minus the substance stuff (prices are regional). For the average freelancer in Canada, that’s not a consequential barrier to entry. That’s <$1k for a year for everything.

If I charge a rate of something like $40/hr, that’s two hours in a month? <2% of revenue. Am I going to risk spending that much extra time fussing with something else for 2% more $$?

Meanwhile Blender gets a lot of investment because the competition is much more expensive. CA$305/mo for Maya and I need to augment it with an adobe subscription for any non-3D work.

replies(1): >>41875330 #
3. cchance ◴[] No.41875330[source]
Sure as long as adobe doesn't decide to go back and do the whole "we own the rights to everything ever opened in one of our apps" again lol
4. BlueTemplar ◴[] No.41875930[source]
Why wouldn't they if they do not want to use them for professional deontology reasons ? What impact size are we talking about ?