←back to thread

721 points ralusek | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.603s | source
Show context
porphyra ◴[] No.41870564[source]
I find that Adobe is really pulling away from open source software with all this AI stuff. A few years ago it could be argued that GIMP, Inkscape, and Darktable could do almost everything that Photoshop, Illustrator, and Lightroom could, albeit with a jankier user interface.

But now none of the open source software can compete with AI generative fill, AI denoising, and now AI rotation.

replies(11): >>41870630 #>>41870686 #>>41870696 #>>41870867 #>>41870891 #>>41871059 #>>41871202 #>>41871746 #>>41871757 #>>41873609 #>>41875611 #
insane_dreamer ◴[] No.41871746[source]
Can't speak for PS vs GIMP but I used to use Illustrator a fair bit and Inkscape was nowhere near it in terms of both features and useability. Now that was 15 years ago, so it may have caught up.
replies(1): >>41873645 #
1. dagmx ◴[] No.41873645[source]
You are correct even today. Inkscape is great but it’s a fraction of the utility that Illustrator offers.

The only people who would actually equate them are people not professionally using these tools everyday.

Even paid apps like affinity designer are a fraction of the functionality of Illustrator.

Again, a great product but people are just dead wrong if they compare them as an absolute.

replies(1): >>41875212 #
2. RunSet ◴[] No.41875212[source]
> The only people who would actually equate them are people not professionally using these tools everyday.

While someone who just needs a functional vector graphics editor and is not being paid to use adobe software might prefer inkscape. Speaking from personal experience, there.

replies(1): >>41875907 #
3. dagmx ◴[] No.41875907[source]
Sure, if they fit your need, nobody is saying you should pay for more.

This is a common response when someone says something is better. It doesn’t mean they’re saying you need the better stuff or judging folks who don’t need it.