←back to thread

270 points lkellar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
MicolashKyoka ◴[] No.41873419[source]
this is a dumb feature, you should judge an image by your perception of it, not how it was created (ie machine or human made).

the anti ai-generated image crowd is a loud minority, they won't matter in the long term and spending dev time on this is questionable decision making at best.

now if you're a forensics company or that is the angle, then yeah it could be an interesting tool to have, might be even more profitable than this custom search as a service thing (obsoleted already by llm tech).

replies(7): >>41873458 #>>41873469 #>>41873524 #>>41873590 #>>41873605 #>>41873732 #>>41873835 #
1. UniverseHacker ◴[] No.41873605[source]
It depends on what you're looking for. If I want a photo of a place I'm thinking of visiting, or a wild animal I'm trying to identify- I want to make sure it's a photo of the actual thing, and not a photorealistic AI artwork tagged with that name that may or may not have anything to do with the real thing.

I'm not anti AI but usually when I do an image search, I'm looking for photos of the real world, not artwork (from humans or AI)- and AI is getting so good I can't visually tell them apart.