←back to thread

Kagi Update: AI Image Filter for Search Results

(help.kagi.com)
270 points lkellar | 4 comments | 17 Oct 24 20:02 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
1. ricardo81 ◴[17 Oct 24 20:44 UTC] No.41873579[source]▶
Semi related +1 for mojeek powering their results. Kagi gets a lot of favour on HN, worth a nod to Mojeek for powering their organic results to an extent.
replies(1): >>41873629 #
2. pera ◴[17 Oct 24 20:49 UTC] No.41873629[source]▶
wow just compare these two results:

https://www.mojeek.com/search?q=baby+peacock&fmt=images

https://www.google.com/search?q=baby+peacock&sclient=img&udm...

replies(2): >>41873683 #>>41873694 #
3. RheingoldRiver ◴[17 Oct 24 20:53 UTC] No.41873683[source]▶
hmm, I am not certain that I prefer the option without the source listed. For example, I might prefer an image from Wikipedia over another image. Or if I am searching for a map and the URL has the word 'historical' I would not choose that one. etc.

It depends on what I am searching for and why I want to use it.

4. ricardo81 ◴[17 Oct 24 20:55 UTC] No.41873694[source]▶
If you look closer, Kagi uses Mojeek for organic results, not images

I guess to me anyway, images/news etc is a sideshow to the wider web, as in a crawler/indexer and not a pretendy meta search.