←back to thread

270 points lkellar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.371s | source
Show context
MicolashKyoka ◴[] No.41873419[source]
this is a dumb feature, you should judge an image by your perception of it, not how it was created (ie machine or human made).

the anti ai-generated image crowd is a loud minority, they won't matter in the long term and spending dev time on this is questionable decision making at best.

now if you're a forensics company or that is the angle, then yeah it could be an interesting tool to have, might be even more profitable than this custom search as a service thing (obsoleted already by llm tech).

replies(7): >>41873458 #>>41873469 #>>41873524 #>>41873590 #>>41873605 #>>41873732 #>>41873835 #
1. alpaca128 ◴[] No.41873524[source]
It is very cumbersome to look at individual images in the search for e.g. reference images just to sort out the garbage. Using AI images for that would defeat the purpose. Not just because of the fact that training AI with AI output degrades the model, indicating it's a net negative on average.

It's not a dumb feature, this is what I wished for less than a week ago when using Google. I don't want my time wasted from judging AI images based on perception, I don't even want to perceive them.