←back to thread

572 points bookofjoe | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
laweijfmvo ◴[] No.41865779[source]
I hope they’re not abandoning page turn buttons for good, like my Oasis has — the only reason I bought the Oasis. Touch screens are just not a good reading experience, for me.
replies(3): >>41865816 #>>41866158 #>>41867052 #
exodust ◴[] No.41867052[source]
Physical page buttons have a small UX disadvantage in that your finger must be located at the button when its time to turn the page. Unlike the soft method where you gently tap screen with finger or pen, and you're not limited to one activation location. So, more energy required with the physical button.

I was disappointed at first the Scribe didn't have buttons, but now I don't care.

replies(3): >>41869718 #>>41872041 #>>41881604 #
1. int_19h ◴[] No.41872041[source]
It's the opposite - with a physical button, you just put your finger on it and keep it there while reading, so that you only need to push slightly to get to the next page. Whereas with touch screen you need to actively move your finger back and forth every time (since keeping it there would block the screen, and in any case you can't really rest it on a capacitive screen without it registering as a touch).

For one-handed reading especially, that alone makes physical buttons significantly more ergonomic, provided that they're placed such that your thumb rests on them naturally when holding the device.