←back to thread

Crokinole

(pudding.cool)
445 points Tomte | 3 comments | 17 Oct 24 16:54 UTC | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
titanomachy ◴[17 Oct 24 17:16 UTC] No.41871570[source]▶
> In non-competitive, less plamigerent settings, their skills really shine

“Plamigerent” isn’t a word, and I can’t find any English words similar to it. It seems an unlikely typo. I wonder if the author included it to catch LLMs plagiarizing his work.

replies(7): >>41871726 #>>41871780 #>>41872235 #>>41872269 #>>41874709 #>>41874953 #>>41875022 #
1. mike_ivanov ◴[17 Oct 24 17:32 UTC] No.41871726[source]▶
Lexical watermarking! If that's the case (and if this idea sticks), I'm wondering how far it could go.

One could imagine a (dystopian?) world where everybody speaks they own highly individualized, maybe even copyrighted language, and where interpersonal communications happen via AI translators.

replies(2): >>41872195 #>>41876126 #
2. collingreen ◴[17 Oct 24 18:18 UTC] No.41872195[source]▶
:( is this our generations version of cyberpunk theme?
3. peeters ◴[18 Oct 24 03:33 UTC] No.41876126[source]▶
That would be an interesting contrast to 1984's dystopian Newspeak, which aimed to eliminate all individuality in language.