←back to thread

721 points ralusek | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
porphyra ◴[] No.41870564[source]
I find that Adobe is really pulling away from open source software with all this AI stuff. A few years ago it could be argued that GIMP, Inkscape, and Darktable could do almost everything that Photoshop, Illustrator, and Lightroom could, albeit with a jankier user interface.

But now none of the open source software can compete with AI generative fill, AI denoising, and now AI rotation.

replies(11): >>41870630 #>>41870686 #>>41870696 #>>41870867 #>>41870891 #>>41871059 #>>41871202 #>>41871746 #>>41871757 #>>41873609 #>>41875611 #
CapsAdmin ◴[] No.41870891[source]
In some way, having followed the open source image generation scene for a while, it feels a little bit like it's opposite?

Most of the ai image generation stuff I've seen from adobe feels late to party in terms of what you can do with open source tools. Where they do compete however is with tight integration, and I guess that's what matters the most to users in the end.

There are plugins for gimp that let you do image generation, inpainting and other things.

As far as what the post shows, it looks very much like current models that generate novel viewpoints of an object, but for illustrations. It might be doable to fine tune this for illustrations and simply vectorise the new viewpoint again. Though this will destroy any structure previously held in the object.

All I'm saying is that we have the tech to do even more than what adobe is doing, we just haven't put it nicely together yet.

replies(1): >>41870973 #
NeroVanbierv ◴[] No.41870973[source]
I think your last paragraph sums it up pretty nicely: users need a good UX to get to these tools.

So I would love if GIMP started shipping these awesome plugins by default to pick up the pace!

replies(3): >>41871008 #>>41871188 #>>41873649 #
Waterluvian ◴[] No.41871188[source]
The more I spend time as a software developer, the more strongly I believe that UX is 80% of what makes a tool good, and that a lot of programmers really just don’t get that.
replies(2): >>41871395 #>>41873736 #
1. dylan604 ◴[] No.41871395{3}[source]
There are also the programmers that do get that, but just don't have the ability to change it. I'm no artist, but I can tell you when something looks bad. I'm constantly playing with CSS to learn new things to make things look better. I'm now in that category of "it looks like someone tried but just didn't achieve, but better than most" level of design.

Programmers making things for other programmers will always be forgiven as long as it works. Programmers making things for the general population will not be forgiven to the same extent if at all. As soon as someone releases something that is polished, it will be used even if it doesn't work as well.