←back to thread

171 points g0xA52A2A | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.282s | source
Show context
low_tech_love ◴[] No.41867927[source]
[flagged]
replies(23): >>41867986 #>>41867995 #>>41868011 #>>41868016 #>>41868179 #>>41868202 #>>41868225 #>>41868314 #>>41868501 #>>41868526 #>>41868534 #>>41868587 #>>41868610 #>>41869045 #>>41869046 #>>41869095 #>>41869111 #>>41869302 #>>41869373 #>>41869409 #>>41869596 #>>41869606 #>>41869834 #
trumpeta ◴[] No.41867986[source]
It's meant to imply that it's as performant as, but safer than c/c++.
replies(1): >>41869184 #
bboozzoo ◴[] No.41869184[source]
But not necessarily less buggy or more useful than the counterparts (if there even are any).
replies(1): >>41871374 #
1. kstrauser ◴[] No.41871374[source]
It does imply there are likely to be different classes of bugs. If the thing compiles at all, someone's done the work to get the types right, and implement all the arms of match expressions, and written at least basic error handling. The errors are more likely to be high-level logic issues that you'd face in any code, not so much trivial implementation mistakes.