←back to thread

OpenVMM – A New VMM for Windows and Linux, Written in Rust

(github.com)
171 points g0xA52A2A | 1 comments | 17 Oct 24 05:42 UTC | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
low_tech_love ◴[17 Oct 24 09:40 UTC] No.41867927[source]▶
I find it interesting that every single piece of software that was ever written in Rust always mentions that very proudly in its title. It's not something I see often with other programming languages (most software is just software and doesn't necessarily advertise the language it was built with). I do not know anything about Rust, so I'm just curious, does this confer a kind of underlying trustworthiness or quality to the application?
replies(23): >>41867986 #>>41867995 #>>41868011 #>>41868016 #>>41868179 #>>41868202 #>>41868225 #>>41868314 #>>41868501 #>>41868526 #>>41868534 #>>41868587 #>>41868610 #>>41869045 #>>41869046 #>>41869095 #>>41869111 #>>41869302 #>>41869373 #>>41869409 #>>41869596 #>>41869606 #>>41869834 #
trumpeta ◴[17 Oct 24 09:52 UTC] No.41867986[source]▶
It's meant to imply that it's as performant as, but safer than c/c++.
replies(1): >>41869184 #
bboozzoo ◴[17 Oct 24 12:49 UTC] No.41869184[source]▶
But not necessarily less buggy or more useful than the counterparts (if there even are any).
replies(1): >>41871374 #
1. kstrauser ◴[17 Oct 24 16:54 UTC] No.41871374[source]▶
It does imply there are likely to be different classes of bugs. If the thing compiles at all, someone's done the work to get the types right, and implement all the arms of match expressions, and written at least basic error handling. The errors are more likely to be high-level logic issues that you'd face in any code, not so much trivial implementation mistakes.