←back to thread

431 points dangle1 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Calavar ◴[] No.41861254[source]
We've lost a lot with the deletion of this repo. Not the code - that's already out in the ether - but the absurdist comedy of the issues, pull requests, and commit history of trying to piecemeal delete third party non-FOSS software.
replies(6): >>41861434 #>>41861797 #>>41861800 #>>41862842 #>>41863375 #>>41864656 #
abbbi ◴[] No.41861434[source]
sorry, but this was a real shitshow. I dont understand: wtf makes people think spamming an repo in the way they did is in any way useful?
replies(3): >>41861505 #>>41862049 #>>41865449 #
Calavar ◴[] No.41861505[source]
The meme/troll issues were edgy teen style humor and not that funny, but the legitimate ones that tried to gently explain what rebase does and went completely ignored were funny because they felt surreal and hyperreal at the same time. Office-Space-esque comedy.
replies(1): >>41861666 #
delfinom ◴[] No.41861666[source]
The troll issues are exactly why my OSS group does not use GitHub at all. It's become a toxic platform for quite awhile.
replies(3): >>41861711 #>>41861825 #>>41866502 #
armada651 ◴[] No.41861711[source]
That's just the reality of any platform that doesn't gatekeep who gets to participate. Eventually assholes are going to join, that's simply unavoidable.
replies(10): >>41861758 #>>41861879 #>>41862185 #>>41862259 #>>41862326 #>>41863497 #>>41864052 #>>41864615 #>>41865709 #>>41868341 #
jen729w ◴[] No.41863497{4}[source]
# Well-Kept Gardens Die By Pacifism

> Good online communities die primarily by refusing to defend themselves.

> Somewhere in the vastness of the Internet, it is happening even now. It was once a well-kept garden of intelligent discussion, where knowledgeable and interested folk came, attracted by the high quality of speech they saw ongoing. But into this garden comes a fool, and the level of discussion drops a little—or more than a little, if the fool is very prolific in their posting. (It is worse if the fool is just articulate enough that the former inhabitants of the garden feel obliged to respond, and correct misapprehensions—for then the fool dominates conversations.)

Read the whole thing:

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/tscc3e5eujrsEeFN4/well-kept-...

replies(3): >>41863861 #>>41863952 #>>41864114 #
jpalawaga ◴[] No.41863861{5}[source]
That’s rose coloured. Maybe people were more intelligent, but even 10 years ago people would absolutely flame each other in GitHub issues on public projects.
replies(1): >>41864164 #
pavel_lishin ◴[] No.41864164{6}[source]
I suspect the author is thinking back to more than ten years ago.

But yes; even newsgroups, BBSes, etc. were subject to this kind of stuff. People have always been people, even smart people with money to purchase computers.

replies(1): >>41865445 #
FactKnower69 ◴[] No.41865445{7}[source]
>I suspect the author is thinking back to more than ten years ago.

Yes, "good ol' days" types will always move the goalposts further and further back when you point out that things were exactly the same in the mythical time period they want to return to

replies(1): >>41870084 #
1. catlikesshrimp ◴[] No.41870084{8}[source]
There were days when internet search engines had operators and really showed results, not "relevant" SEO.

Botnets weren't a thing, either.

replies(1): >>41870355 #
2. pavel_lishin ◴[] No.41870355[source]
But OP was talking about humans' behavior toward each other - I'll grant that SEO-spam maybe falls under that, but I don't think that Google's leadership fucking up search results is the same.