←back to thread

171 points g0xA52A2A | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.417s | source
1. garblegarble ◴[] No.41868595[source]
Technically somebody already has: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24370792
replies(1): >>41868917 #
2. roetlich ◴[] No.41868917[source]
Also: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23189918 Not literally "in Cobol" in the title, but almost. And in both cases the primary novelty is that it's written in Cobol.