←back to thread

220 points Vt71fcAqt7 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.407s | source
Show context
cube2222 ◴[] No.41861846[source]
This looks like quite a huge breakthrough, unless I'm missing something?

~25x faster performance than Flux-dev, while offering comparable quality in benchmarks. And visually the examples (surely cherry-picked, but still) look great!

Especially since with GenAI the best way to get good results is to just generate a large amount of them and pick the best (imo). Performance like this will make that much easier/faster/cheaper.

Code is unfortunately "(Coming soon)" for now. Can't wait to play with it!

replies(4): >>41861942 #>>41863225 #>>41864501 #>>41865018 #
godelski ◴[] No.41865018[source]

  > surely cherry-picked
As someone who works in generative vision, this is one of the most frustrating aspects (especially for those with less GPU resources). There's been a silent competition for picking the best images and not showing random results (even when there are random results they may be a selected batch). So it is hard to judge actual quality until you can play around.

Also, I'm not sure what laptop that is but they say 0.37s to generate a 1024x1024 image on a 4090. They also mention that it requires 16GB VRAM. But that laptop looks like a MSI Titan, which has a 4090, and correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the 4090 is the only mobile card with 16GB?[0] (I know desktop graphics have 16 for most cards). The laptop demo takes 4s to generate a 1024x1024 image. But they are chopped down quite a bit[1]

I wonder if that's with or without TensorRT

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nvidia_graphics_proces...

[1] https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-RTX-4090-Laptop...

replies(3): >>41865131 #>>41867104 #>>41868207 #
1. bemmu ◴[] No.41867104[source]
0.37s is only 11x away from realtime 30fps. I wonder if that will enable some cool new popular application for it besides batch image generation.
replies(1): >>41867207 #
2. godelski ◴[] No.41867207[source]
You can do much much better with GANs at that resolution. I'm sure you could combine the two for upsampling