←back to thread

431 points dangle1 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
AdmiralAsshat ◴[] No.41863032[source]
Good job, team. Companies are sure to open source their legacy proprietary applications now after that warm reception.
replies(2): >>41863502 #>>41865042 #
jraph ◴[] No.41863502[source]
They didn't open source anything though. They shared some code under some restrictive license.
replies(2): >>41863622 #>>41864157 #
zizee ◴[] No.41863622[source]
The "chilling" effect is still the same.
replies(2): >>41864008 #>>41864494 #
consteval ◴[] No.41864494[source]
Right, and what we're "chilling" is using software in a way not consistent with its license.

That's good, IMO. Don't steal IP and you don't have to worry about getting caught for stealing IP. FYI: simply hiding the code doesn't fix the issue - disgruntled employees and whistleblowers do exist.

replies(1): >>41866507 #
1. zizee ◴[] No.41866507{3}[source]
Given the wide variety of views expressed in this HN discussion, it's clear there isn't consensus on how this is being interpreted, so I think you're wrong in claiming that there is only one type of behaviour being discouraged.

That said, I'm just as a casual observer lying in bed with the flu, I probably should just shut up until I know more the situation.