The joke was the same, we had a board game, then we made a mobile video game based on the board game, now they are selling a board game based on the video game that was based on the board game.
The portability of a Paperwhite combined with the note-taking ability of a Scribe… there’s probably a market for that.
Edit: also, holding the device semi-opened, hands on its back, seems much more comfortable than holding it by the bezels as we currently do.
Especially for things like reading contracts which I find miserable on a screen
That's like saying confortable cars have been present since their inception, and then present as a example a royal coach.
True, you technically had colors in books. Just like you had books with hardbacks with gold inlays. The fact is that the bulk of the books being published were not color books because that costs a premium to make and moreso to buy. Hence the default stabilized in softcover books with B/W print on flimsy paper.
With e-readers you do not get higher production costs, and you can just download your books and benefit from that. Some ebooks even ship with high resolution images where you can zoom in all you want or need.
There are already erasable notebooks that allow you to scan your notes and send the document to a storage of your choosing. Even BIC sells one of them.
>much closer to just having a reading light on
First of all, that contradicts the evidence from my eyes, but second of all, even if it were true, you'd have to persuade me that reading an old-fashion paper book with a reading light is any better at helping me get to sleep at night than reading from an iPad. I'm not buying that one either mainly because a reading light is going to throw more light onto the ceiling, where of course it gets reflected down again, and neuroscientists know (and the Scandinavian tradition "knew" in practice decades ago) that light from the top of the field of vision is more disruptive to sleep than light coming straight into the eye or from the sides or bottom of the visual field.
(I do prefer an eReader over a tablet, but I don’t think the light is magically better.)
> it's not movable
I don't know what to say here. This is obviously false. Why did you say this?
What do you think is the difference between a "book" and a "codex"? Why do you think ancient texts are divided into "books"?
According to wikipedia:
"The codex (pl.: codices /ˈkoʊdɪsiːz/)[1] was the historical ancestor format of the modern book. Technically the vast majority of modern books use the codex format of a stack of pages bound at one edge, along the side of the text. But the term "codex" is now reserved for older manuscript books, which mostly used sheets of vellum, parchment, or papyrus, rather than paper.[2] "
I would say a codex is a book yes, you are right there. The defining characteristic for me is the binding method, the flippable pages and the bookiness factor of the book.
That said, unbound scrolls that are scrolled into scrolls of scroll are definitely scrolls and not books.
So 2 to 1, gg.
<https://goodereader.com/blog/electronic-readers/readmoo-to-l...>
<https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/10/21361545/folding-e-ink-re...>
(I'm not even remotely saying this would be a Good Thing. I recently saw my first foldable smartphone. And it was broken.)