←back to thread

204 points joveian | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.2s | source
Show context
anotherhue ◴[] No.41862429[source]
20 years ago it was considered a 'doss year' (waste/screw-around etc.), and the general perception was that it was for those that require a little more time in the oven developmentally before proceeding to the next stage. I was a child then so I don't know if that was true, but certainly the majority of people who took it were not academically inclined.
replies(4): >>41862502 #>>41863766 #>>41864626 #>>41864922 #
abrookewood ◴[] No.41864922[source]
So the article suggests that has changed - people who take the YT year get significantly higher results in their senior years.
replies(1): >>41865118 #
1. anotherhue ◴[] No.41865118[source]
Hard to split that from just age based improved performance though.