←back to thread

339 points Wingy | 7 comments | | HN request time: 0.371s | source | bottom
Show context
LetsGetTechnicl ◴[] No.41858944[source]
There have been so many instances since it's been down that I tried to access IA resources and realized they were unavailable. I'm still bitter that of all the targets a hacker could've chose, it was the IA. Couldn't have happened to a better website. I plan on upping my monthly donation as soon as I can.
replies(2): >>41861011 #>>41861122 #
Alifatisk ◴[] No.41861011[source]
Hope these hackers receive lots of negative reactions from their peers and people around them.
replies(2): >>41864711 #>>41865629 #
7402 ◴[] No.41864711[source]
Some source information about the group that has claimed responsibility:

"A group known as SN_Blackmeta claimed responsibility for the attack, with a confusing antisemitic message that the archive “belongs to the USA” as if it were a government project."

https://9to5mac.com/2024/10/15/internet-archive-data-breach-...

"Internet Archive Cyber Attacked by Pro-Palestinian Hackers"

https://www.cybersecurityintelligence.com/blog/internet-arch...

"Anti-Israel hacker group hacks 'Internet Archive', exposing 31 million users"

https://www.ynetnews.com/business/article/bkird2rjke

replies(2): >>41864990 #>>41866755 #
1. Smithalicious ◴[] No.41864990[source]
Can I say "false flag"?
replies(4): >>41865591 #>>41866014 #>>41866036 #>>41901256 #
2. pcthrowaway ◴[] No.41865591[source]
Yeah, there's plenty of material which I've only been able to easily find on archive.org which does not look good for Israel. The dominant powers seem to be more effective at keeping their propaganda hosted than the resistance, so a takedown of the IA seems very much in line to me with Israeli capabilities and motives.
replies(1): >>41866003 #
3. fasa99 ◴[] No.41866003[source]
Curse those clever Pro-Palestine hacktivists, what with going onto IA and erasing all material that's critical of Israel
4. olalonde ◴[] No.41866014[source]
Unpopular opinion: I suspect many "hacktivists" are driven primarily by the challenge/thrill of hacking, with the cause being more of an afterthought to appease their conscience.
5. sandwichmonger ◴[] No.41866036[source]
I see no reason to believe this is a false flag. If there's no evidence for it, why should we believe it to be so?
replies(1): >>41866950 #
6. cartoonworld ◴[] No.41866950[source]
Attribution is not super easy. But here's what IA says: (tl;dr false flag)

"They’re doing it just to do it. Just because they can. No statement, no idea, no demands.” [Jason] Scott said, referencing a post made by an account named SN_Blackmeta on Telegram claiming responsibility for the attack and hinting at another one planned for Friday.

7. WillPostForFood ◴[] No.41901256[source]
You and Alex Jones.