←back to thread

ArchiveBox is evolving: the future of self-hosted internet archives

(docs.sweeting.me)
663 points nikisweeting | 1 comments | 16 Oct 24 16:18 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source

We've been pushing really hard over the last 6mo to develop this release. I'd love to hear feedback from people who've worked on big plugin systems in the past, or anyone who's tried our betas!
Show context
toomuchtodo ◴[16 Oct 24 16:53 UTC] No.41861236[source]▶
https://github.com/ArchiveTeam/grab-site might be helpful. I'm a fan of the ability to create WARC archives from a target, uploard the WARC files to object storage (whether that is IA, S3, Backblaze B2, etc), and then keep them in cold storage or serve them up via HTTPS or a torrent (mutable, preferred). The Internet Archive serves a torrent file for every item they host; one can do the same with WARC archives to enable a distributed archive. CDX indexes can be used for rapidly querying the underlying WARC archives.

You might support cryptographically signing WARC archives; Wayback is particular about archive provenance and integrity, for example.

https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/fdd/fdd0005... ("CDX Internet Archive Index File")

https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/fdd/fdd0002... ("WARC, Web ARChive file format")

https://github.com/internetarchive/wayback/tree/master/wayba... ("Wayback CDX Server API - BETA")

replies(3): >>41861288 #>>41861743 #>>41861951 #
0cf8612b2e1e ◴[16 Oct 24 18:10 UTC] No.41861951[source]▶

  The Internet Archive serves a torrent file for every item they host
I had no idea. I have found the IA serving speed to be pretty terrible. Are the torrents any better? Presumably the only ones seeding the files are IA themselves.
replies(2): >>41862348 #>>41864588 #
1. pabs3 ◴[16 Oct 24 22:40 UTC] No.41864588[source]▶
The torrents have better speeds because they have WebSeeds for multiple IA servers, so you can download from multiple servers at once.