←back to thread

486 points dbreunig | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.215s | source
Show context
eightysixfour ◴[] No.41863546[source]
I thought the purpose of these things was not to be fast, but to be able to run small models with very little power usage? I have a newer AMD laptop with an NPU, and my power usage doesn't change using the video effects that supposedly run on it, but goes up when using the nvidia studio effects.

It seems like the NPUs are for very optimized models that do small tasks, like eye contact, background blur, autocorrect models, transcription, and OCR. In particular, on Windows, I assumed they were running the full screen OCR (and maybe embeddings for search) for the rewind feature.

replies(7): >>41863632 #>>41863779 #>>41863821 #>>41863886 #>>41864628 #>>41864828 #>>41869772 #
moffkalast[dead post] ◴[] No.41863886[source]
[flagged]
eightysixfour ◴[] No.41863976[source]
The 7940HS shipped before recall and doesn't support it because it is not performant enough, so, that doesn't make sense.

I just gave you a use case, mine in particular uses it for background blur and eye contact filters with the webcam and uses essentially no power to do it. If I do the same filters with nvidia broadcast, the power usage is dramatically higher.

replies(2): >>41864053 #>>41864126 #
1. wtallis ◴[] No.41864053[source]
Intel is also about to launch their first desktop processors with an NPU which falls far short of Microsoft's performance requirements for a "Copilot+ PC". Should still be plenty for webcam use.