←back to thread

431 points dangle1 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
fsflover ◴[] No.41861478[source]
Related: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41662105

Winamp contained modified GPL code, violating the GPL (github.com/winampdesktop)

18 points by mepian 19 days ago | 6 comments

replies(2): >>41861657 #>>41861961 #
bscphil ◴[] No.41861961[source]
I can't see the original issue, but it's interesting that the title chooses to highlight the fact that the GPL code was modified. Actually, under the GPL, this fact is immaterial. If the Winamp player contained any GPL code at all, modified or not, then it is a derivative work of that GPL code and anyone receiving a copy of Winamp is entitled to demand the full corresponding source be provided under a GPL license.
replies(4): >>41862254 #>>41862325 #>>41863354 #>>41864002 #
1. enedil ◴[] No.41864002[source]
I think the point here is that so that people reading the article don't complain about "they didn't contain GPL code directly" somehow justifies thinking that that was bikeshedding and not a legitimate violation of the license. Of course, it does not matter if the code was modified or not, but that point might not be clear to the readers who don't have enough experience with GPL.