←back to thread

431 points dangle1 | 8 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
Show context
Calavar ◴[] No.41861254[source]
We've lost a lot with the deletion of this repo. Not the code - that's already out in the ether - but the absurdist comedy of the issues, pull requests, and commit history of trying to piecemeal delete third party non-FOSS software.
replies(6): >>41861434 #>>41861797 #>>41861800 #>>41862842 #>>41863375 #>>41864656 #
croemer ◴[] No.41861797[source]
The issues are still preserved by archive.org, e.g. https://web.archive.org/web/20241009234026/https://github.co...
replies(1): >>41863623 #
1. n3storm ◴[] No.41863623[source]
This is why archive was down?
replies(1): >>41863995 #
2. readyplayernull ◴[] No.41863995[source]
It's WWII all over again with switched roles, and hacktivits DDOSed archive.org
replies(2): >>41865590 #>>41866395 #
3. yapyap ◴[] No.41865590[source]
What in the world does that sentence even mean in this context?
replies(1): >>41868380 #
4. pxc ◴[] No.41866395[source]
I don't see any credibility to the claim that 'BlackMeta' were/are in fact hacktivists. Do you have any reason to repeat that?
replies(2): >>41868230 #>>41869320 #
5. LikelyABurner ◴[] No.41868230{3}[source]
You can scroll their X page and it's extremely clear that they're focused on the Gaza war (https://x.com/Sn_darkmeta) and they openly state that they attacked the Internet Archive because it was based in America which supports Israel (https://x.com/Sn_darkmeta/status/1844358501952618976).

We can quibble about whether a "hacktivist" group can even exist at all or if it's a convenient lie the Internet has collectively told itself to justify groups of thugs attacking the targets they don't like as "the good ones", but they fit the modern definition of a hacktivist group.

replies(1): >>41868803 #
6. pxc ◴[] No.41868803{4}[source]
I don't have a Twitter account, so I can't generally scroll on someone's page to see anything chronological-ish. :-\

(I remember trying at the time of the incident and having less success than now.)

Thanks for sharing the direct link to that video. At the time of the initial outage, I only saw some assertion that they were 'a hacktivist group' on some article on Bleeping Computer, and at the same time the only reason they'd claimed for the DDoS was 'because we could'. Hacking something just because you can is, of course, not doing hacktivism.

If these people are sincere, they are idiots in their propaganda strategy and artless in their 'hacktivism'... but definitely hacktivists.

But tbh this seems too stupid and ill-directed to me to be anything other than a false flag operation. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Either way, thanks for the additional context!

replies(1): >>41869634 #
7. ◴[] No.41869320{3}[source]
8. PawgerZ ◴[] No.41869634{5}[source]
https://nitter.poast.org/Sn_darkmeta