←back to thread

431 points dangle1 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
VonGuard ◴[] No.41861368[source]
This is a cautionary tale for preservationists. My current preservation project is still not open because we are very slowly reviewing the code to make sure we don't accidentally include any IP when we open the source code. The real things that get you are similar to what happened here: codecs, graphics libraries, and a really big one to look out for is fonts. It'd be great if there was a scanner that could detect this stuff, but unfortunately, the scanning tools out there tend to go the other way like Black Duck: they detect open source code, not closed source.
replies(4): >>41861469 #>>41861524 #>>41861575 #>>41861816 #
londons_explore ◴[] No.41861524[source]
The thing is, the vast majority of graphics libraries from 1992 the IP owner no longer cares about, and the code usually has nearly zero commercial value.

I wish more were brave enough to just publish it with an open license, and then if the owner complains you take it down and rewrite.

Any damages for distributing 30 year old source code are hopefully in the single-digit-dollars range anyway.

replies(2): >>41861596 #>>41861615 #
Loudergood ◴[] No.41861596[source]
The problem is you'll get crushed by legal fees in the meantime.
replies(1): >>41861620 #
londons_explore ◴[] No.41861620[source]
but if courts gave out damages of $10 for this sort of offence (taking into account the very low commercial value of the IP stolen), then very few people would even bother pursuing it in court.
replies(1): >>41861650 #
VonGuard ◴[] No.41861650[source]
Courts do not do that. The people suing would offer up a big old list of damages into the millions and then negotiate down from there to something like 6 figures AND the loser covering the court costs. The American legal system is completely broken, and amounts to two people piling up money, then the one with the bigger stack wins both stacks of money. This is completely untenable for a non-profit to even think about, let alone to incur the risk.
replies(2): >>41861948 #>>41863080 #
xboxnolifes ◴[] No.41863080[source]
At least in the US, loser doesn't pay count costs for the opposing party.
replies(1): >>41863162 #
1. VonGuard ◴[] No.41863162[source]
This is entirely within the realm of the judge to do. They do it fairly frequently as punishment to people who bring bad law suits and lose.