←back to thread

352 points keithly | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
pandatigox ◴[] No.41845382[source]
Current final year dental student pitching in here. While dentists of the past may push for unnecessary annual radiographs, the curriculum in dental school has changed to favour evidence-based dentistry. Annual bitewings are only indicated if you're a high caries risk, and, as the article mentions, 2-3 years if you're low caries risk. So your younger/newer dentist will be following much better protocols (and hopefully not scamming you)!
replies(13): >>41845600 #>>41845764 #>>41846436 #>>41847074 #>>41847971 #>>41848039 #>>41848503 #>>41848894 #>>41848929 #>>41849355 #>>41849576 #>>41850511 #>>41850865 #
crimsoneer ◴[] No.41846436[source]
Slightly worrying that evidence-based dentistry wasn't the default position (though not surprising). I'm always kind of amazed that when I look up the robust evidence for even things as common as flossing, the evidence just...doesn't seem to be there. Let alone all the myriad of dental products from various mouth washes, tooth pastes, brushes and water picks.

How we've ended up regulating medicine to the nth degree, but when it's teeth we're like "oh well, lol", continues to mystify me.

replies(9): >>41846657 #>>41846676 #>>41846685 #>>41846699 #>>41847176 #>>41847273 #>>41847797 #>>41848386 #>>41850321 #
konfusinomicon ◴[] No.41847797[source]
my 95yr old grandmother who still has her OG chompers always told me to only floss the teeth i want to keep, and given hers are still usable after 9 decades, i listened
replies(1): >>41851056 #
DowagerDave ◴[] No.41851056[source]
do you think your sample size of one could be attributed to any of the many other aspects, most outside the control of the owner?
replies(1): >>41863149 #
1. SirMaster ◴[] No.41863149[source]
Is flossing really that controversial?

It's so simple to do, might as well do it even even it only might provide a benefit.

I certainly can't imagine any downsides to it...