←back to thread

204 points joveian | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.502s | source
Show context
artemonster[dead post] ◴[] No.41862021[source]
[flagged]
piva00 ◴[] No.41862088[source]
> Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting.

I suggest you re-read this list: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

replies(2): >>41862166 #>>41862192 #
Rendello ◴[] No.41862166[source]
Is the overall quality tangential?
replies(1): >>41862203 #
piva00 ◴[] No.41862203[source]
I'd say so, it doesn't develop any discussion or conversation, it's bike shedding. Even more that overall quality is a question of judgment, I read the article perfectly fine and the writing style wasn't a distraction.

What do you think we gain in the discussion by debating the quality of writing (which was entirely passable) instead of the substance of it? To me it's quite clear: absolutely nothing.

replies(1): >>41862346 #
theodric ◴[] No.41862346[source]
'Bike shedding', in the context of the current Irish bike shed controversy - heh
replies(1): >>41862770 #
1. LinuxAmbulance ◴[] No.41862770[source]
What is the Irish bike shed controversy?
replies(2): >>41862891 #>>41864816 #
2. KineticLensman ◴[] No.41862891[source]
https://www.irishtimes.com/life-style/2024/09/06/its-not-eve...
3. talideon ◴[] No.41864816[source]
Oof! Too soon!