←back to thread

204 points joveian | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
anotherhue ◴[] No.41862429[source]
20 years ago it was considered a 'doss year' (waste/screw-around etc.), and the general perception was that it was for those that require a little more time in the oven developmentally before proceeding to the next stage. I was a child then so I don't know if that was true, but certainly the majority of people who took it were not academically inclined.
replies(4): >>41862502 #>>41863766 #>>41864626 #>>41864922 #
1. Filligree ◴[] No.41862502[source]
Which seems fair enough. There’s already a year difference between the youngest and oldest student in any given class; if you want your children to do well, make sure they’re among the oldest.

The problem is it might come too late to change their self-perception. A year is a lot of time when you’re nine

replies(1): >>41862584 #
2. wiredfool ◴[] No.41862584[source]
TY is typically at 15ish.
replies(2): >>41863685 #>>41865982 #
3. SoftTalker ◴[] No.41863685[source]
A year is still a lot then. You can do a lot in a year if you don't have to worry about earning a living and have the time to engage in things that are interesting.
4. Filligree ◴[] No.41865982[source]
That's the problem — it might well be far too late.