←back to thread

Tesla Optimus Bots Were Remotely Operated at Cybercab Event

(www.bloomberg.com)
217 points mfiguiere | 1 comments | 14 Oct 24 21:10 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
TeeWEE ◴[15 Oct 24 02:54 UTC] No.41844476[source]▶
This results in me trusting Tesla less.

If this was fake, how do we know the robovans were not remotely operated? They might as well be too to get the stock price up?

There is no way to know. I am really doubting Tesla now. It wouldn’t surprise me that, in order to prevent mishaps during the event, everything is remotely operated…

People will say: that’s not true. But where did Tesla clearly specify this upfront?

I saw the initial fullscreen disclaimer. But that might also apply to the robovans right?

replies(8): >>41844568 #>>41844769 #>>41844881 #>>41844910 #>>41844932 #>>41845058 #>>41848103 #>>41849148 #
block_dagger ◴[15 Oct 24 03:15 UTC] No.41844568[source]▶
After reading the Isaacson biography, it’s clear to me Elon is not a stable or trustworthy person. The evidence continues to mount.
replies(4): >>41844590 #>>41844755 #>>41845064 #>>41846166 #
mike_hearn ◴[15 Oct 24 08:13 UTC] No.41846166[source]▶
I've also read the biography. It's clear that he's stable and trustworthy enough to run multiple large companies, assemble a loyal force of allies who follow him around to his different ventures, a force that includes multiple family members, and win long term government contracts.

The conclusion Isaacson himself reached is that Musk has an extraordinary need for intensity and challenge, to the extent that he becomes uncomfortable and unhappy if there isn't something big riding right on the edge of going spectacularly wrong. This is a trait that most people don't have, and it's ideal for doing the kinds of things he does. But don't mistake that need for intensity for being unstable or dishonest.

replies(1): >>41851935 #
consteval ◴[15 Oct 24 18:59 UTC] No.41851935[source]▶
Au Contraire, don't mistake drive and ambition for being a good person. It's not uncommon for highly successful people to be awful. Typically, you need to be bone headed, rude, highly opinionated. Often you need to lie and steal.

Just because Musk has financial success does not mean he isn't awful. In fact, financial success is probably one of the worst indicators of being a person of high integrity.

replies(1): >>41856526 #
mike_hearn ◴[16 Oct 24 07:35 UTC] No.41856526{3}[source]▶
I didn't mention "being a good person" anywhere, that's not the question at hand largely because I don't think it's a usefully complex way to think about people.
replies(1): >>41859809 #
1. consteval ◴[16 Oct 24 14:56 UTC] No.41859809{4}[source]▶
Ok, replace that word with stable and trustworthy, which you did say. I get very frustrated with people who play pedantic games. I know you understand what I'm saying. You're not being clever by doing this. All you're showing is that you don't have an argument or any useful thoughts to add, but you love the sound of your own voice, so you'll butt in with pedantic bullshit. It doesn't make you look smart; it makes you look pathetic and conceited.