←back to thread

1737 points pseudolus | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
coldpie ◴[] No.41859298[source]
Passed 3-2 along party lines. Remember this when you're going to vote. Elections matter.
replies(5): >>41859344 #>>41859355 #>>41859357 #>>41859529 #>>41860362 #
ranlork[dead post] ◴[] No.41859529[source]
[flagged]
llamaimperative ◴[] No.41859586[source]
> Of course Republican commissioners are going to vote "no" if the FTC is handing out popular rulings like candy just before the election.

What? Why is that defensible? Make life worse/keep life bad for Americans so we have a better chance in an election? Do you hear yourself?

replies(1): >>41859686 #
1. macinjosh ◴[] No.41859686[source]
Why is it defensible for an administration to wait until the last days of their term, right around election time, to do their job?
replies(4): >>41859820 #>>41860318 #>>41860725 #>>41866287 #
2. llamaimperative ◴[] No.41859820[source]
See here for a rebuttal of the same argument on a different topic:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41626381

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41626251

Short answer is that you're just not paying attention.

3. xrd ◴[] No.41860318[source]
I think the main reason to vote for the current administration is because of the actions taken by the FTC in the last four years. It isn't just this last month.

I would recommend reading the newsletter "Big" by Matt Stoller for context.

Lina Khan seems widely hated across the aisle, so that's a good first step.

The SEC has also taken unprecedented actions under Rohit Chopra.

4. dghlsakjg ◴[] No.41860725[source]
The FTC under the current administration has been going gangbusters the entire term.

On what basis do you make the accusation that the administration has been sandbagging their own policy changes?

5. DrillShopper ◴[] No.41866287[source]
Damn we better pull Amy Coney Barrett off the Supreme Court then