/top/
/new/
/best/
/ask/
/show/
/job/
^
slacker news
login
about
←back to thread
The Internet Archive is back online
(arstechnica.com)
339 points
Wingy
| 4 comments |
16 Oct 24 11:09 UTC
|
HN request time: 0s
|
source
Show context
throwaway48476
◴[
16 Oct 24 12:22 UTC
]
No.
41858246
[source]
▶
>>41857754 (OP)
#
When the internet archive censors a website is it deleted permanently or just not publicly available?
replies(2):
>>41858337
#
>>41858362
#
chirau
◴[
16 Oct 24 12:33 UTC
]
No.
41858337
[source]
▶
>>41858246
#
I don't think they censor anything, strictly archiving. Do you know of any instance in which they censored a site?
replies(4):
>>41858352
#
>>41858519
#
>>41858704
#
>>41859916
#
throwaway48476
◴[
16 Oct 24 12:35 UTC
]
No.
41858352
[source]
▶
>>41858337
#
http://web.archive.org/web/20240000000000*/twitter.com/taylo...
For one. I'm just curious what their policy is.
replies(2):
>>41858585
#
>>41858826
#
1.
lukas099
◴[
16 Oct 24 12:59 UTC
]
No.
41858585
[source]
▶
>>41858352
#
I only know what I just read on wikipedia about her, but it seems like she has been heavily doxxed — I'm guessing she requested this information about herself be excluded? If so, I'm not sure I'd classify that as censorship.
replies(1):
>>41858602
#
ID:
GO
2.
throwaway48476
◴[
16 Oct 24 13:01 UTC
]
No.
41858602
[source]
▶
>>41858585 (TP)
#
It's her own tweets, not dox.
replies(1):
>>41869348
#
3.
lukas099
◴[
17 Oct 24 13:11 UTC
]
No.
41869348
[source]
▶
>>41858602
#
Not dox but I was thinking there could be old materials in there that people were using to dox her. Idk, why else would they remove it?
replies(1):
>>41871063
#
4.
◴[
17 Oct 24 16:17 UTC
]
No.
41871063
{3}
[source]
▶
>>41869348
#
↑