←back to thread

10 points linuxlizard | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.733s | source

Why is the Ethernet jack still a huge monstrosity? I see these small boards appearing and the ridiculous sized Ethernet jack looms over the PCB.

https://www.cnx-software.com/2024/10/14/wiznet-w55rp20-evb-pico-board-features-w55rp20-sip-with-w5500-ethernet-controller-and-rp2040-mcu/

We have gone from giant USB-A to the slim USB-C and converters are available. We have mini Display Port and converters are available. Why has no one tried to miniaturize RJ45?

Show context
JohnFen ◴[] No.41850063[source]
My speculation: there's no real market need. Devices that don't have enough space for the RJ45 are probably using WiFi anyway and have no burning need for a physical ethernet connection.

Since making the connectors smaller also makes them less robust, why take on that tradeoff in the absence of a clear benefit?

I understand that R-Pis and the like appear to be an exception, but they don't represent the amount of marketshare required to spur the sort of industry movement needed to develop Yet Another Standard.

replies(1): >>41851577 #
linuxlizard ◴[] No.41851577[source]
That does make sense. Ethernet is easily replace by WiFi. There's no easy replacement for USB (can't charge a phone over Bluetooth (yet)).
replies(1): >>41858363 #
1. stephenr ◴[] No.41858363[source]
Inductive charging is the replacement for usb charging.

I literally don't remember the last time I charged my iPhone by plugging it in - there are even inductive power banks available now.