←back to thread

339 points Wingy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.198s | source
Show context
seestem ◴[] No.41858155[source]
It would be better if the Internet Archive was decentralized without a central point of failure, maybe run on something like bittorent.
replies(8): >>41858170 #>>41858243 #>>41858272 #>>41858279 #>>41858590 #>>41859340 #>>41860089 #>>41861043 #
maire ◴[] No.41858272[source]
I don't know if bittorrent has improved - but 20 years ago I had a personal issue with it.

At that time our son was using it for games. He goes away to college and came home for the first school break. I get a phone call from our internet provider asking if our son was home. I was so shocked and handed the phone to our son.

Apparently at that time bittorrent was optimizing for the most efficient path to a host. Since we had relatively good connection, the mighty weight of the internet was funnelling through our tiny internet provider to our son's computer. The provider (without our knowing it) had made a deal with our son that he would only turn on bittorrent between midnight and 6 AM. I doubt other providers would be so generous.

I have been sceptical of bittorrent since that day.

replies(1): >>41858326 #
1. jetrink ◴[] No.41858326[source]
All clients today (and probably back then) have options to limit bandwidth consumption including throttling, scheduling, and total data transfer caps. For serving mostly HTML and images, dedicating even 10% of a home broadband connection to serving content would allow many, many people per day to access archived pages.