←back to thread

294 points NotPractical | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
dylan604 ◴[] No.41855041[source]
Take this as a lesson. If you've been a dev long enough, you've worked on a project knowing that how the project is being done isn't the best method with every intention of going back to make it better later, but not at the expense of getting the MVP up and running. You'll also have seen that never actually happening and all of those bad decisions from the beginning still living all the way to the bitter end.

I'm guessing not one person involved would have ever imagined their code being left on a machine just left out in the open exposed to the public completely abandoned by the company.

replies(4): >>41855099 #>>41855913 #>>41856088 #>>41856846 #
flomo ◴[] No.41856088[source]
They might have had the most perfectly developed decommissioning process. And nobody is going to care when their paychecks stop showing up, and everything suddenly gets trucked-off into receivership.

Given the era and constraints, I don't see how it was irresponsible or 'sloppy' to have a local database on these things. This most likely is not on development.

replies(4): >>41856311 #>>41858208 #>>41859859 #>>41861159 #
1. raffraffraff ◴[] No.41856311[source]
This.

I often wonder what was left behind when the financial crash happened. Watching documentaries and movies about it, it looked me like several large banks and insurers closed up shop overnight, and people were leaving the next day with boxes containing their personal effects.