←back to thread

32 points bookofjoe | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.398s | source
Show context
xracy ◴[] No.41853512[source]
Gosh, would be real cool if they hadn't bought all those shares, and just had the cash on hand to help... I don't know... invest in engineering and making planes fly with doors on them.
replies(4): >>41853520 #>>41853701 #>>41853813 #>>41853870 #
s1artibartfast ◴[] No.41853701[source]
Speaking abstractly,Why would that be any better?

Why keep the cash on hand when you can raise cash.

I get that people have an emotional reaction to Boeing, but it's not like owning 10 billion dollars of Treasury bonds would have prevented a door plug blowout

replies(3): >>41853715 #>>41853841 #>>41853854 #
1. burkaman ◴[] No.41853841[source]
It's not an emotional reaction to Boeing, it's a logical reaction to the fact that stock buybacks are a blatant form of market manipulation that were illegal for most of the 20th century. Nobody should be doing them, it's nothing to do with Boeing specifically. Buybacks are almost always bad for employees, customers, and if you're a big enough corporation, the world.
replies(1): >>41854011 #
2. s1artibartfast ◴[] No.41854011[source]
Negative reaction to stock BuyBacks are also emotional and irrational. I've never heard anyone articulate a cogent argument why they are worse than paying a dividend.