←back to thread

252 points diwank | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.396s | source
Show context
ChuckMcM ◴[] No.41852838[source]
In many ways (no pun intended :-)) I would relate to having an iPad mini and a much much dumber phone which was just text/chat and voice. I have gotten there because I'm constantly in this weird tension between wanting a bigger screen on my phone because the app I'm using and wanting a smaller phone so that it is easier to pocket and carry around. A friend of mine did the folding screen phone thing and that has its advantages but I really like a small phone (and ideally with a long battery life so no 1000 nit screens on it). Definitely first world/21st century problems :-). I do find engineering tradeoffs in product design an interesting thing though.
replies(17): >>41852963 #>>41853041 #>>41853115 #>>41853179 #>>41853406 #>>41853444 #>>41853579 #>>41853621 #>>41853648 #>>41853659 #>>41853753 #>>41854029 #>>41854726 #>>41855101 #>>41855796 #>>41856051 #>>41856903 #
xattt ◴[] No.41853648[source]
Apple keeps a lot of owners addicted to their phones by making Watch support exclusive to iPhone.

I’d love to go dumbphone and a Watch synced to an iPad at home, but this is not an option.

replies(4): >>41853734 #>>41853831 #>>41854541 #>>41855547 #
1. gxs ◴[] No.41853831[source]
You can probably get fairly close to do this by using an apple watch with a sim card

I used to leave the house with just my watch and it was great - I could read and send text messages, email, even take calls on my watch and have everything synced up to my phone at home. You can even download music to it and pair it to your airpods.

The missing piece here is just having a dumb phone - somehow I think that with some ingenuity you might be able to something that serves 80% of your needs here or something like that.

replies(1): >>41854392 #
2. xattt ◴[] No.41854392[source]
My closest solution would be to piggyback off my partner’s iPhone using family watch pairing, and use my own dumbphone.