←back to thread

135 points andsoitis | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
lovethevoid ◴[] No.41849070[source]
> The decline in the United States is driven by increasing numbers of deaths because of conditions such as diabetes and heart disease in people aged roughly 40 to 60.

People are asking if we should be surprised by the headline but are missing this. As suggested in the article by the researchers, there is something dragging down the average since the 2010s. Not even hitting the general expectation of ~75 years. We don’t have solid answers yet, only theories.

So yes, generally while going up against the process of aging is going to create barriers (eg can we get to 130 years old), we are also failing to raise the baseline which is the bigger issue that people might not grasp when it comes to “life expectancy rates”.

replies(4): >>41849103 #>>41849266 #>>41849314 #>>41855788 #
hn_throwaway_99 ◴[] No.41849103[source]
> We don’t have solid answers yet, only theories.

The exact quote you gave had a pretty solid answer, certainly not just "theories".

replies(2): >>41849449 #>>41849483 #
daveguy ◴[] No.41849449[source]
I think the distinction there is between immediate cause and root cause. Heart disease and diabetes (or complications thereof) is the immediate cause of death, but what is causing an increase in those diseases is theory at this point.
replies(1): >>41849488 #
orionsbelt ◴[] No.41849488[source]
Is it not clearly obesity? Why everyone is obese is perhaps unclear (although portion sizes, ultra processed foods, screen time and sedentary lives, etc, all seem to likely play a clear role), but I’d be surprised if the level of obesity that exists didn’t cause more heart disease and diabetes.
replies(4): >>41849599 #>>41849678 #>>41853685 #>>41854489 #
safety1st ◴[] No.41849599[source]
Yes. Why is everyone tiptoeing around this? The obesity rate has increased by something like 50% since the turn of the century. It is a major risk factor for all the causes of death being discussed here. Sure there are probably many factors but this is clearly a big one.
replies(2): >>41849829 #>>41849877 #
lovethevoid ◴[] No.41849877[source]
Go here https://www.cdc.gov/bmi/adult-calculator/index.html and enter your height and weight. If you fall above the healthy category, you are part of the obesity rate and are what most research points to when it comes to increased cardiovascular risk. Also for asians the numbers are slightly lower.

I find that when I point this out, people often get mad. They feel they aren't obese. But the research doesn't support them, if you are anywhere outside of the "healthy" categorization you are at the same risk (that we know of so far) as "clinically obese" people.

replies(9): >>41850040 #>>41850122 #>>41852499 #>>41852624 #>>41852869 #>>41853536 #>>41853563 #>>41853653 #>>41853827 #
1. thaumasiotes ◴[] No.41853827{6}[source]
> I find that when I point this out, people often get mad. They feel they aren't obese. But the research doesn't support them, if you are anywhere outside of the "healthy" categorization you are at the same risk (that we know of so far) as "clinically obese" people.

Depends. All cause mortality is notoriously lower for "overweight" people than "normal weight" people.

replies(1): >>41854516 #
2. vundercind ◴[] No.41854516[source]
Really smells like one of those “some alcohol is healthier than none” things where there’s a subset of the otherwise-healthiest group that’s in the otherwise-healthiest group because they’re very sick.
replies(2): >>41854735 #>>41856257 #
3. thaumasiotes ◴[] No.41854735[source]
Why? "Overweight" and "normal weight" weren't determined by reference to what's better.
4. watwut ◴[] No.41856257[source]
Normal weight and overweight were determined by percentage of population at some point. The boundaries are not about lifespan, they never were.