←back to thread

589 points atomic128 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.216s | source
Show context
sylware ◴[] No.41842736[source]
Typical.

Should not even be allowed to finance nuclear reactors before the long term storage facilities and recycling facilities

replies(3): >>41843597 #>>41846954 #>>41856631 #
theultdev ◴[] No.41843597[source]
Yucca Mountain.
replies(1): >>41843649 #
EasyMark ◴[] No.41843649[source]
That’s off the table currently
replies(1): >>41843659 #
theultdev ◴[] No.41843659[source]
Because of politics and nothing else.

That's the only issue with nuclear, politics.

replies(1): >>41846605 #
atwrk ◴[] No.41846605[source]
But politics are real, and thus are it's consequences.
replies(1): >>41853525 #
1. theultdev ◴[] No.41853525[source]
It sure does have consequences.

Easy to split the atom, not so easy to vote (correctly) apparently.

I guess we'll keep shipping it around and storing it onsite, even though a massive facility is already built to house all of it.

Maybe one day people will realize the establishment you keep voting in doesn't want cheap and unlimited energy.

Until then, let's keep talking in circles about it.