←back to thread

252 points diwank | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
hnburnsy ◴[] No.41850392[source]
Ugh, that bezel.

Will full coverage screens with a software driven, virtual bezel every be a thing?

replies(4): >>41850452 #>>41850746 #>>41852669 #>>41853297 #
alpaca128 ◴[] No.41850746[source]
I don't get why some people get so worked up about bezels. I like being able to hold my devices without accidental inputs, and to me they look better anyway.

I wouldn't mind 3cm wide bezels and accordingly larger batteries.

replies(1): >>41851643 #
hnburnsy ◴[] No.41851643[source]
Virtual bezels and let the user choosing.
replies(2): >>41852484 #>>41852957 #
alpaca128 ◴[] No.41852957[source]
And pay for a screen size I won't use? No, thanks.
replies(2): >>41853476 #>>41855591 #
1. hnburnsy ◴[] No.41853476[source]
Could be dynamic, example, watching a movie, no bezels. Remove the bezels from the top and/or bottom, that changes on the device orientation. Placed in a stand remove the bezels, add them back when picked up.
replies(1): >>41853677 #
2. lucb1e ◴[] No.41853677[source]
That sounds awesome actually. Makes me wonder how hard it would be on a rooted phone to just have it tell the software the screen is a few pixels smaller so you can touch chose sides safely, and remove the restriction again when you're in movie mode

Never heard of anyone making that but this would honestly sound like the first innovation in several years, not incremental like "GPS now finds a solution 2 seconds faster" and "the mobile data now uses 7% less energy" but something that is now possible that wasn't a feature before