←back to thread

252 points diwank | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ChuckMcM ◴[] No.41852838[source]
In many ways (no pun intended :-)) I would relate to having an iPad mini and a much much dumber phone which was just text/chat and voice. I have gotten there because I'm constantly in this weird tension between wanting a bigger screen on my phone because the app I'm using and wanting a smaller phone so that it is easier to pocket and carry around. A friend of mine did the folding screen phone thing and that has its advantages but I really like a small phone (and ideally with a long battery life so no 1000 nit screens on it). Definitely first world/21st century problems :-). I do find engineering tradeoffs in product design an interesting thing though.
replies(17): >>41852963 #>>41853041 #>>41853115 #>>41853179 #>>41853406 #>>41853444 #>>41853579 #>>41853621 #>>41853648 #>>41853659 #>>41853753 #>>41854029 #>>41854726 #>>41855101 #>>41855796 #>>41856051 #>>41856903 #
osrec ◴[] No.41852963[source]
What was the pun? Many/mini?
replies(2): >>41852980 #>>41853160 #
1. imjonse ◴[] No.41853160[source]
You can safely put 'no pun intended' after actually having no puns in the text. It can be disorienting but such is truth sometimes.
replies(2): >>41853420 #>>41853462 #
2. johnmaguire ◴[] No.41853420[source]
Pun intended?
3. kibwen ◴[] No.41853462[source]

    typeof(x) y = (typeof(x))x; // no pun intended
replies(2): >>41854321 #>>41854400 #
4. DennisP ◴[] No.41854321[source]
Back when I was coding for a living, I tried things like that almost a dozen times to see if they would make anyone laugh, but no pun in ten did.
5. vl ◴[] No.41854400[source]
But why cast to it’s own type?