←back to thread

The Stallman Report

(stallman-report.org)
197 points pkilgore | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
aag ◴[] No.41844159[source]
Here is a web site that defends Stallman:

https://stallmansupport.org/richard-stallman-honors-and-awar...

I take no position.

replies(2): >>41844193 #>>41845103 #
jcranmer ◴[] No.41845103[source]
I'll be extremely charitable and assume you meant to link to the site in general as a rebuttal, and not specifically to the webpage that just lists his awards, because saying that someone's misdeeds don't matter because they also did great things is a rather gross viewpoint and a continuing insult to the people who are victims both of the "Great Men" and the wannabe-"Great Men" who feel safe doing such acts in the belief that future greatness will similarly exonerate them.

The page that's most responsive to what's brought up is here: https://stallmansupport.org/debunking-false-accusations-agai.... However, I feel that it doesn't really debunk the core accusations here, which is essentially that Stallman's views on what constitutes consent just aren't acceptable in today's world.

replies(2): >>41845402 #>>41904607 #
aag ◴[] No.41845402[source]
I was just trying to find something that took the other side. As I said, I take no position on these accusations. I simply don't know enough.
replies(1): >>41846414 #
fsflover ◴[] No.41846414[source]
You repeated an already existing link from comments, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41838335, and changed it to look less credible.
replies(1): >>41853153 #
1. aag ◴[] No.41853153[source]
I didn't repeat it or change it. I hadn't seen it.