←back to thread

84 points jshchnz | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
asdev ◴[] No.41850924[source]
would be interested to know if the "AI" in this is anything further than an OpenAI wrapper and RAG
replies(3): >>41851100 #>>41851694 #>>41852704 #
pajeets ◴[] No.41851100[source]
literally 90% of AI startups right now are some combination of the above and their "edge" is just a long system prompt that tells them to "be this niche and output response that mimics an expert from that niche"

This was never going to work out because OpenAI is literally watching everybody and how they are using it including prompts. AI wrapper startups serve these functions:

- wrappers prop up NVIDIA which are owned by the people giving VCs the money to invest in wrappers who are long Nvidia too.

- wrappers give OpenAI RSU holders a fuzzy warm feeling and they are able to see what the market is doing with their product so they can pull "Amazon Basics"

- IRS, attorneys, accountants, politicians love them all because they all get to squeeze milk from the fume

replies(1): >>41851749 #
infecto ◴[] No.41851749[source]
While the space is hot and most will fail, I disagree with the general negative sentiment. The same could be said for most/all startups. They all can be distilled into some simple implementation.
replies(2): >>41852107 #>>41854477 #
think_build ◴[] No.41852107{3}[source]
Exactly. "All SAAS for b2b is just an SQL wrapper". That's until they do something distinguishing, make implementation easier/faster/cheaper or come up with a new technology. Yes the playing field is level now, but what can they do in 1,3,10 years? How will new models play into this?

Way more than just a tarpit.

replies(1): >>41852902 #
1. pajeets ◴[] No.41852902{4}[source]
but SQL isn't a blackbox and is a declarative language with a strict syntax

Piggybacking on OpenAI or any GPT is not at all the same as SQL