←back to thread

PEP 762 – REPL-acing the default REPL

(peps.python.org)
89 points Numerlor | 1 comments | 14 Oct 24 19:25 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
wodenokoto ◴[15 Oct 24 09:09 UTC] No.41846571[source]▶
I feel like there’s a missing discussion as to why they aren’t going with Ipython
replies(7): >>41848474 #>>41851105 #>>41851125 #>>41851190 #>>41851214 #>>41852161 #>>41852289 #
1. ◴[15 Oct 24 17:57 UTC] No.41851190[source]▶