←back to thread

352 points keithly | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
agentultra ◴[] No.41848509[source]
I am all for evidence-based medicine making its way into dentristry if it's lacking... but if you're someone who is worried about cumulative exposure to X-ray length radiation, what is the dosage? And can we compare it relative to to say, millimeter scanners at the airport or a domestic flight?

I was under the impression that the digital machines they use these days are:

1. localised 2. very, very low dose

replies(3): >>41849545 #>>41849555 #>>41849604 #
ericmcer ◴[] No.41849555[source]
My dentist said something like "it exposes you to less radiation than eating a banana", but she also left the room when the machine was firing.
replies(3): >>41849748 #>>41850313 #>>41850584 #
1. rootusrootus ◴[] No.41850584[source]
I remember taking my kid for an x-ray of his wrist and the tech lined it all up, and then said "okay, dad and me are going over here while I take the picture." My son immediately wanted to know what the hell we just exposed to him that wasn't safe for us.

In retrospect, the policy should be to let the parent stay. The risk to me is no worse than the risk to my kid. It's easy enough to explain why the tech should go behind a shield.